church in Harlech, Wales |
George Herbert’s wonderful poem “Longing,” full of the
frustration of unanswered prayer, uses in its second-to-last stanza the
metaphor of the beggar. I’ll quote stanzas 11-13 of this 14-stanza poem:
Lord, didst
thou leave thy throne
Not to relieve? How can it be
That thou art grown
Thus hard to me?
Were sin alive, good cause there were
To bear:
But now both
sin is dead,
And all thy promises live and bide;
That wants his head,
These speak and chide,
And in thy bosom pour my tears,
As theirs.
Lord Jesu, hear my heart,
Which hath been broken now so long,
That ev’ry part
Hath got a tongue:
Thy beggars grow: rid them away
To-day. (lines 61-88)
In this poem, Herbert’s speaker has been crying out to be
heard by the Lord, but he has not received (or perceived) a response. He tries
various arguments to persuade God to respond. Stanza 11 asks why God would
condescend to leave his throne (in the Incarnation) and come down to humanity
and yet not relieve human suffering? Herbert follows this argument in stanza 11
with another line of reasoning: if sin were getting in the way of the speaker’s
communion with God, then that would be an appropriate cause of God’s not
hearing his prayers. Herbert’s reasoning here is modeled after that of the
psalmist in Ps 66:18: “If I had cherished iniquity [sin] in my heart, the Lord
would not have listened.”
Yet sin is not the problem. Again following the psalmist
(66:19 “But truly God has listened”), Herbert reveals in stanza 12 that (a)
“sin is dead” and (b) God’s “promises live.” Sin is not gone (it “wants his
[its] head,” that is, its way), but God’s promises keep the speaker from
completely giving in to sin (“these [the promises] speak and chide” the
narrator). Not only that, but God’s promises are pleading to the Lord on behalf
of the speaker (“these . . . in thy bosom pour my tears”).
Herbert’s speaker is left with no answers still. He’s a
child of God (stanza 10, lines 59-60), he isn’t given over to sin, and he has
God’s promises on his side. Approaching God with arguments to persuade him (logos) isn’t working. Time to resume pathos, reminding the Lord about the
speaker’s broken heart in stanza 13. Even in the midst of trying to tug on
God’s compassion, Herbert slips in one more argument. If God won’t respond
through positive appeals, maybe he will through a negative one. The speaker
envisions the pieces of his broken heart each having its own tongue,
surrounding the King like a bunch of beggars. All you have to do to get rid of
these annoyances, the speaker states, is to grant their request. I’m reminded
of Jesus’ parable of the persistent widow, who wears the judge down with her
repeated requests (Luke 18:1-8). (Many a mother has no doubt been worn down by
her children’s requests this way. “Fine! You can have whatever you want. Just stop bothering me.”)
Herbert uses this metaphor of begging in prayer in the poem
“Gratefulness” as well, where he is asking God to give him a grateful heart.
“See how thy beggar works on thee / by art,” his speaker says (lines 3-4),
where “begging” is revealed to be a tactic to move God through “Perpetual
knockings at thy door” (13).
While the speaker has not yet received any answers to his
requests in Herbert’s poem “Longing,” other poems from Herbert, such as “Praise
2,” reveal the poet’s responses to the Lord having heard his prayers:
Thou hast granted my request,
Thou hast heard me;
Thou didst note my working breast,
Thou hast spared me. (lines 5-8)
Psalm 66 concludes with praise to the God who does answer
prayer, in His own time; who forgives sin when we confess (1 Jn 1:9); and who
loves his children with an everlasting love: “Blessed be God, because he has
not rejected my prayer or removed his steadfast love from me!” (66:20).
No comments:
Post a Comment